Montecristo Edmundo - Cuban Cigars

Montecristo Edmundo - 15 cigars (packs of 3)

Montecristo Edmundo - 15 cigars (packs of 3) [5.3 x 52]

Cigar Points Value : 165 cigar points worth $1.67

Named after Edmundo Dantes, hero of Alexandro Dumas' famous novel "The Count of Montecristo", the Edmundo is the first size to be added to Montecristo's standard range since 1971. It is the second new 52 ring gauge, parejo size to be introduced by Habanos, SA within a year.

Length: 5.3 inches (135mm)

Ring Gauge: 52

Factory Shape: Edmundo

Strength: Medium - Full

Packing Code: D-C-C/P-3-n-15

Per Box : $165.00




Avg. Customer Rating 7.92

ADD Email Stock Alert: Montecristo Edmundo - 15 cigars (packs of 3)

Displaying 1 to 5 (of 5 reviews)

Result Pages: 1

MonteCristo Edmundo

Date Added: Tuesday 24 June, 2008

	Review by Jonathan	Appearance: 8 out of 10
		Construction: 9 out of 10
	Average rating: 8.40	Flavor: 8 out of 10
	Value: 9 out of 10
	Experience: 8 out of 10
	Review notes: Good little cigar. Be patient and age it properly. Gets better as it progresses. Certain worth a try when you fancy a change

Great even smoke!

Date Added: Monday 21 April, 2008

	Review by david	Appearance: 9 out of 10
	Box Code/Year: ???/jul07	Construction: 9 out of 10
	Average rating: 8.60	Flavor: 8 out of 10
	Value: 8 out of 10
	Experience: 9 out of 10
	Review notes: Very nice, just what I expected. My first Habano (way back when) was a Monte and this one was no disappointment! Wrapper is a nice smooth texture, medium brown, no red hues. Construction was superb with an easy draw and high volume of smoke. Not too many big veins in the wrapper, but the wrapper was not oily at all, very silky to the touch. I like the extra "2" to that brings the ring gauge up to 52 as I prefer thick cigars. Smoked it till the nub was less than an inch which is always how I know I like a cigar!!

Well rounded smoke

Date Added: Monday 21 April, 2008

	Review by Dave	Appearance: 9 out of 10
	Box Code/Year: Jul 07	Construction: 9 out of 10
	Average rating: 8.60	Flavor: 8 out of 10
	Value: 8 out of 10
	Experience: 9 out of 10
	Review notes: I'm a newbie whereas reviews are concerned, so keep that in mind. Smoked one right off the post truck and I agree with other reviews who have said they need a bit of time in the humidor. Smoked another just 2 weeks later and what a difference. Both cigars were well constructed with an even burn and easy draw. The wrapper is a nice shade of brown, with none of the reddish hue I've come to associate with most Cubans. As for taste, I will try my best to describe the 2nd (2 wks in the humidor). The first 1/3 struck me as spicy with earthy overtones. The cigar really begins to shine in the 2nd 1/3 with a blend of earth, coffee and chocolate. As is the case with many cigars I smoke, the last 1/3 is ALWAYS a crescendo of flavors that have me smoking too fast and heating up the leaf!! I wish I had better restraint. I burned my fingers trying to smoke every bit of the nub. Overall, I liked this cigar and would recommend it to anyone.

Not much flavor here.

Date Added: Wednesday 07 November, 2007

	Review by Frank	Appearance: 8 out of 10
	Box Code/Year: Don't know	Construction: 8 out of 10
	Average rating: 5.60	Flavor: 4 out of 10
	Value: 4 out of 10
	Experience: 4 out of 10
	Review notes: Rather disappointed with this one. A nicely made cigar that is just plain boring. If you can imagine a bland version on a Hoyo De Montery Excalibur #1. Not a bad flavor mind you, just bland, not much of it. I got the packs of 3, so I can't tell the box code or year.

worth the wait

Date Added: Monday 12 February, 2007

	Review by Michael	Appearance: 9 out of 10
	Box Code/Year: XLB Dec 05	Construction: 9 out of 10
	Average rating: 8.40	Flavor: 8 out of 10
	Value: 8 out of 10
	Experience: 8 out of 10
	Review notes: I love this size cigar. I smoked one very slowly at the driving range yesterday. The first 15 minutes were a bit tight, but then it evolved nicely to a more rich satisfying smoke. I think the Edmundo would would improve nicely with a bit more age. Perhaps another year or so..(?)

Displaying 1 to 5 (of 5 reviews)

Result Pages: 1