| Displaying 1 to 29 (of 29 reviews) |
Result Pages: 1 |
|
 |
| MC Edmundo |
Date Added: Thursday 05 July, 2012 |
|
|
Review by Robert |
Appearance: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Box Code/Year: jul 2011 |
Construction: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Average rating: 9.20 |
Flavor: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Value: 8 out of 10 |
|
|
Experience: 8 out of 10 |
|
|
Review notes: This stick had the wrapper color that I have come to expect from montecristo. It was rich and chocolatey, almost like a #2, but without the piquant finish that the #2 gives. I enjoyed it immensely. |
|
|
|
|
| good medium smoke |
Date Added: Thursday 06 October, 2011 |
|
|
Review by Steve |
Appearance: 9 out of 10 |
|
|
|
Construction: 9 out of 10 |
|
|
Average rating: 8.60 |
Flavor: 8 out of 10 |
|
|
Value: 9 out of 10 |
|
|
Experience: 8 out of 10 |
|
|
Review notes: wide ring gauge always pretty to look at and to hold between fingers, nice brown wrapper, strength not as strong as i would expect, light to medium, flavor wise woody mixed with coffee aroma. this wide cigar produces plenty of smoke, a good hour smoke to relax your mind from the daily stress. looking forward to seeing it improve with age in humidor. |
|
|
|
|
| Patience is a virtue |
Date Added: Thursday 28 July, 2011 |
|
|
Review by Paul |
Appearance: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Box Code/Year: FEB 08 |
Construction: 9 out of 10 |
|
|
Average rating: 9.00 |
Flavor: 9 out of 10 |
|
|
Value: 8 out of 10 |
|
|
Experience: 9 out of 10 |
|
|
Review notes: Recently I wrote a review on this vitola after three weeks in my humidor; that time I found the taste somewhat lacking in flavor and the typical Monti "twang".
However, I smoked one after it spent two months in the humidor and the change was quite dramatic. This vitola shows excellent construction with a dark vein-free wrapper oozing with oils; generous volume of beautiful blue smoke, razor sharp burn with a firm pepper and salt ash (I tapped it at about 2 inches).
This is what you expect from the first class Monti, some sweetnes with the typical Monti "twang"; its taste does not change though entire lenght, and there is no harshness at all.
It is somewhat pricey so I shall be saving it for some special occasions.
It is a MUST for any serious cigar smoker! |
|
|
|
|
| Nice pleasant cigar |
Date Added: Tuesday 14 June, 2011 |
|
|
Review by Paul |
Appearance: 8 out of 10 |
|
|
Box Code/Year: OCT 08 |
Construction: 9 out of 10 |
|
|
Average rating: 8.40 |
Flavor: 7 out of 10 |
|
|
Value: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Experience: 8 out of 10 |
|
|
Review notes: Following a mandatory three week rest in my humidor I smoked one from the box of 25.
Visually it shows perfect construction with a dark chocolate wrapper and perfectly applied tripple cap; burn was razor sharp with beautifull blue smoke. However, taste was uniformly mild throughout the entire lenght, but it lacked the typical Monti sweet "tang"; I actually prefered No.4 from FEB 09. Definitelly needs some more age - I shall retest it after another 3-6 months.
But let us talk about the value we all get from CL!
Last year I saved some money to buy some habanos on my trip to Europe. To my surprise there were none available in airport duty free shops neither in Rome, Wienna or Munich.
And retail prices were unbelievable; one Edmundo sold for e20.00= 30 USD, 3-pack of Monti #4 was e21.00 which equals to about 10.00 USD per stick.
We all should be thankful to CL for such favorable pricing on the top of outstanding service! |
|
|
|
|
| DARK!!! |
Date Added: Monday 15 February, 2010 |
|
|
Review by Carl |
Appearance: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Box Code/Year: MAR09 |
Construction: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Average rating: 10.00 |
Flavor: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Value: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Experience: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Review notes: My main man Kevin sent me the DARKEST box of Edmundos ive ever seen and even though they are young I smoked em one after another until the box was empty. Bold rich tasty flavors of coffee and dark choc. with a long and lasting spicy finish !!! Thanks Kevin !!! |
|
|
|
|
| Fine Monte! |
Date Added: Wednesday 27 January, 2010 |
|
|
Review by Joe |
Appearance: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
|
Construction: 9 out of 10 |
|
|
Average rating: 9.60 |
Flavor: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Value: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Experience: 9 out of 10 |
|
|
Review notes: This is one fine Montecristo! I recently bought a box of the Petite Edmundos and decided to try this version. Although a bit smaller in ring size it is fantastic. Full to medium in strength, it a is smooth smoke with hints of cedar, leather, coffee, and just a touch spicy. Although my favorite Monte is still the #2, this is quickly becoming my second. I recomend all to try this smoke! |
|
|
|
|
| AWSOME !!!! |
Date Added: Monday 18 January, 2010 |
|
|
Review by Carl |
Appearance: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Box Code/Year: AUG 09 |
Construction: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Average rating: 10.00 |
Flavor: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Value: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Experience: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Review notes: Thanks to kevin he finally found me the best box of Edmundos ive ever smoked. Dark oily and full of flavor! The box he sent me almost looked too good to smoke.Yes they are young but full of that monte flavor we all love !!! I have 10 left and dont see them making it thru the week! Thanks Kevin and thank you cubanlous! The best cuban cigars on the web !!!! |
|
|
|
|
| My Favorite Monte |
Date Added: Saturday 19 December, 2009 |
|
|
Review by Greg |
Appearance: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Box Code/Year: MTG/ May 06 |
Construction: 9 out of 10 |
|
|
Average rating: 9.60 |
Flavor: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Value: 9 out of 10 |
|
|
Experience: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Review notes: First I bought a 15 pack. I was so impressed that I bought 2 full boxes. This is my favorite Monte. Very well made cigar with smooth flawless wrappers. 1 in 5 have an uneven burn. Medium draw that produces a solid white/gray ash. Starts with flowery taste that turns to a coffee nutty taste. Great aroma. With 3 years of age these one of the best cigars I've ever smoked. I will smoke this over a Monte #2 any day. |
|
|
|
|
| Edmundo Excellence |
Date Added: Saturday 24 October, 2009 |
|
|
Review by Chris |
Appearance: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
|
Construction: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Average rating: 9.80 |
Flavor: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Value: 9 out of 10 |
|
|
Experience: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Review notes: I smoke a lot of different types, and brands, but you can never go wrong with a Monte! I usually smoke #2's or #4's, but just finished an Edmundo. Lovely 'till the end. I truly don't mind burning my fingertips in search of that last puff. I just put a box in my cart. |
|
|
|
|
| Great smoke! |
Date Added: Thursday 30 July, 2009 |
|
|
Review by Joe |
Appearance: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
|
Construction: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Average rating: 9.80 |
Flavor: 9 out of 10 |
|
|
Value: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Experience: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Review notes: These came to me as part of the recent assorted sampler pack of Monte's. Although my favorite is still the #2's, this one was a great smoke. It's the same ring size in a shorter format. Fine for when you don't have the time for a #2. A mellow cigar yet packed with flavour. Easy draw and an even burn. Again, a great cigar. Thanks to the assortment I got to try this one out without having to buy a whole box, yet that's exactly what I am going to do after I finish this review! |
|
|
|
|
| rough start but then :) |
Date Added: Sunday 28 June, 2009 |
|
|
Review by George |
Appearance: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
|
Construction: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Average rating: 9.40 |
Flavor: 9 out of 10 |
|
|
Value: 8 out of 10 |
|
|
Experience: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Review notes: Perhaps it was the cut or my lighting style but after a an inauspicious beginning it was smooth sailing, coffee and kahlua wasn't bad either. Good times. |
|
|
|
|
| A very happy bunny |
Date Added: Monday 22 June, 2009 |
|
|
Review by Paul |
Appearance: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
|
Construction: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Average rating: 9.80 |
Flavor: 9 out of 10 |
|
|
Value: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Experience: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Review notes: I recently got three of these as part of a Montecristo sampler pack (I thought I'dbroaden my horizons beyond the No 4), and I must say that so far it is my favourite smoke from the set. A delightful flavour, not too full bodied, and suprisingly stayed pleasant to the last puff.
I think if I were a little richer, this could take me away from my No 4s and convert me to an Edmundo smoker. I can recommend it if you are looking for a relaxing smoke on a sunny afternoon in the garden with a good book and a cool beer. |
|
|
|
|
| woody flavor with a hint of spice |
Date Added: Sunday 10 May, 2009 |
|
|
Review by Michael |
Appearance: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
|
Construction: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Average rating: 9.80 |
Flavor: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Value: 9 out of 10 |
|
|
Experience: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Review notes: Just had the Monte Edmundo today and I have to say I was very impressed and pleased. Great woody flavor with a hint of spice. Nice crisp draw and beautiful puffs of smoke. This cigar was beautiful looking fat cigar and tasted great! I will buy more. |
|
|
|
|
| Great smoke |
Date Added: Monday 13 April, 2009 |
|
|
Review by Keith |
Appearance: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
|
Construction: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Average rating: 9.80 |
Flavor: 9 out of 10 |
|
|
Value: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Experience: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Review notes: Great smoke. Not harsh but very flavorful. Burns good and feels good in your hand. This is my favorite size of cigar. I also like the Churchill's because I have found the larger ring gauges provide the best flavor. You will not be disappointed with this cigar. |
|
|
|
|
| Kind of disapointed |
Date Added: Sunday 05 April, 2009 |
|
|
Review by Bruce P |
Appearance: 9 out of 10 |
|
|
Box Code/Year: 2008 |
Construction: 7 out of 10 |
|
|
Average rating: 6.60 |
Flavor: 5 out of 10 |
|
|
Value: 6 out of 10 |
|
|
Experience: 6 out of 10 |
|
|
Review notes: I was thinking this would be quite a cigar being my real go to is the little brother the PE. I was expecting the same explosive flavor the PE gives off. This one just never relly kicks in and tends to be a td underfilled. Maybe with a little tie they will get better. |
|
|
|
|
| getting better |
Date Added: Wednesday 11 March, 2009 |
|
|
Review by Brian |
Appearance: 9 out of 10 |
|
|
|
Construction: 9 out of 10 |
|
|
Average rating: 8.40 |
Flavor: 8 out of 10 |
|
|
Value: 8 out of 10 |
|
|
Experience: 8 out of 10 |
|
|
Review notes: A strange one this...not sure if people were expecting too much because of the size but i find that if you take your time with this one and let the flavours come out in there own time it is a very tasty cigar. Not sure if they have changed the blend but i really like the new ones more. |
|
|
|
|
| RESPONSE TO GOOD BAD & UGLY |
Date Added: Thursday 29 January, 2009 |
|
|
Review by Marc |
Appearance: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Box Code/Year: 2006 |
Construction: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Average rating: 9.40 |
Flavor: 8 out of 10 |
|
|
Value: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Experience: 9 out of 10 |
|
|
Review notes: I read with great interest Anthony's revies on the Edmundo called "The Good, Bad & Ugly. I am a part owner in a retail cigar shop here in Canada and have probably travelled to Cuba at least 15 times over the years to holiday and purchase Cuban's right from the factory and I can tell you this. No matter where you purchase your cigars, even directly from the factory in Cuba you can end up with fakes. Having extensive experience with the Monte Edmundo's and most other Cuban brands for that matter if these cigars were as bad as you describe, they weren't authentic Edmundos and what I would have done is returned the entire box to the retailer for a refund. Even if you are buying directly at the factory I would recommend that in addition to checking for all the regular stickers and markings on the box that you smoke at least one cigar from the box before puchasing. Any legitimate retailer will allow you to do this. As for my rating of the Monte Edmundo I think this is one of the best Robusto's on the market, particular when you take price into consideration. The Edmundo has a nice meaty ring size and while not overly strong, it has pleasent moderate taste. Enother one of those cigars that starts out nicely, burns evenly with no hot spots and it good right to the nub. An interesting cigar which I feel gives the Montecristo 2 a run for the money has the Brand names top cigar. |
|
|
|
|
| The Good, The Bad and The Ugly |
Date Added: Wednesday 15 October, 2008 |
|
|
Review by Anthony |
Appearance: 2 out of 10 |
|
|
Box Code/Year: APR 06 |
Construction: 4 out of 10 |
|
|
Average rating: 5.00 |
Flavor: 9 out of 10 |
|
|
Value: 8 out of 10 |
|
|
Experience: 2 out of 10 |
|
|
Review notes: OK this is not a cigar review. This is a review of a box of cigars I recently bought NOT FROM CUBAN LOU'S!!!!! I bought this unfortunate box of cigars for a local retailer and I regretted it horribly.
I had a few of these from time to time and enjoyed them thoroughly so I decided to get a box. ( I will review the cigars in another posting as they are from a different box) I bought a box, sealed, and brought them home. upon opening them I detected the pleasant smell of fine cuban cigars. Giddy as a kid on christmas I brought the box to my humidor and started to unpack them. I noticed a few had a slightly damaged foot, small crack no biggie. I then found some that had cracks from the head to the band and a few with 1.5" cracks in the foot. In a box of 25 a total of 11 were damaged in some way. I brought the box back and received a new one.
Moral of the story is when you pickup or order cigars always check them before leaving the store. |
|
|
|
|
| Delightful Smoke |
Date Added: Wednesday 08 October, 2008 |
|
|
Review by James |
Appearance: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
|
Construction: 9 out of 10 |
|
|
Average rating: 9.60 |
Flavor: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Value: 9 out of 10 |
|
|
Experience: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Review notes: I had the pleasure of smoking a relatively young Edmundo two weeks ago, and it's still front and center in my mind.
Upon receipt, I was greeted with a set aging beautifully with a nice bit of plume on the wrapper. I immediately added the group to my humidor of No. 2's and No. 4's and tried to forget about them. Around 5 1/2 months I grabbed a glass of old rye whiskey, and sat down for an evening smoke. The next 180 minutes were pure bliss. On appearance, the ring fits my large hand well, and I find the length to be optimal. In general, the smoke had an ideal density, and the whiskey complimented the spice (more leather than pepper in my opinion) and body of the Edmundo to really bring out the flavor. The draw was ideal, the ash firm and even, and the core was well balanced throughout at all phases. I ashed twice, the second about 4 inches from the band, and must've been distracted as I let the core die. After successfully relighting, the cigar still smoked beautifully, although a little hotter, all the way down to the band. Great balance and fantastic smoke. The flavors were already fairly well integrated, but as a fine wine becomes more balanced with age, I fathom this batch of Edmundos will mature even more in the next 1 to 3 years. What a treat. |
|
|
|
|
| Solid reliable cigar. |
Date Added: Wednesday 06 August, 2008 |
|
|
Review by Paul |
Appearance: 9 out of 10 |
|
|
|
Construction: 9 out of 10 |
|
|
Average rating: 8.60 |
Flavor: 9 out of 10 |
|
|
Value: 8 out of 10 |
|
|
Experience: 8 out of 10 |
|
|
Review notes: These are excellent cigars, but basically are the No. 2 without the topedo format. I would say I prefer the No2 , simply because of the convenience of the shape. however, as something different to try, I hightly recommend these. |
|
|
|
|
| Coming into their own |
Date Added: Thursday 24 July, 2008 |
|
|
Review by drray |
Appearance: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Box Code/Year: 2004 |
Construction: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Average rating: 9.80 |
Flavor: 9 out of 10 |
|
|
Value: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Experience: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Review notes: I bought a box of these when they were first released in 2004 and then after tasting them, bought several more boxes and put them in my humdor to age. After three years of aging I brought a box to a great dinner and then the remainder on a hunting trip. I think everyone who tasted them went out and bought them. The newer ones require some aging to reach their peak but they are fine cigars at a very reasonable price. This cigar also comes in a shorter version - the petite edmundo. |
|
|
|
|
| Edmundo |
Date Added: Friday 11 July, 2008 |
|
|
Review by Sonia |
Appearance: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Box Code/Year: BUE/Mar08 |
Construction: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Average rating: 10.00 |
Flavor: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Value: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Experience: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Review notes: Que maravilla¡¡¡
Esta caja que he recibido es casi perfecta ya que tiene el color que tanto me gusta(maduro) y por si fuera poco los puros estan magnificos,tienen una esponjosidad y un sabor dificilmente igualables por eso mi calificacion va a ser de 10.
Un placer. |
|
|
|
|
| Revision Edmundo |
Date Added: Wednesday 25 June, 2008 |
|
|
Review by Sonia |
Appearance: 8 out of 10 |
|
|
Box Code/Year: ROA/JUL06 |
Construction: 9 out of 10 |
|
|
Average rating: 9.20 |
Flavor: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Value: 9 out of 10 |
|
|
Experience: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Review notes: Parece que no sea un Montecristo ya que es algo diferente a los clasicos Monte nº 2 o nº 4.Tiene un aroma especial para esta marca,tiene un dulzor persistente hasta el final de la fumada.En conclusion realmente bueno |
|
|
|
|
| Montecristo Edmundo |
Date Added: Friday 06 June, 2008 |
|
|
Review by Adam |
Appearance: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
|
Construction: 9 out of 10 |
|
|
Average rating: 9.60 |
Flavor: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Value: 9 out of 10 |
|
|
Experience: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Review notes: Great Cigar,good construction,nice thick guage.A big smoke ,but not overpowering.Easy Draw,spongy feel.This is a real nice thick Monte for the afternoon.Nice woodsy flavor, without any aftertaste.A good choice if you like Monte's.
Worth having in your humidor!! |
|
|
|
|
| Edmondo |
Date Added: Tuesday 13 May, 2008 |
|
|
Review by Peter |
Appearance: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
|
Construction: 9 out of 10 |
|
|
Average rating: 9.60 |
Flavor: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Value: 9 out of 10 |
|
|
Experience: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Review notes: This is my second box and I will continue to add these to my humadore every year. The burn is consistant. The flavor is well balanced. This cigar needs 3-4 months seasoning. |
|
|
|
|
| Ok, but not great....yet! |
Date Added: Sunday 17 February, 2008 |
|
|
Review by bob |
Appearance: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Box Code/Year: May 07 |
Construction: 8 out of 10 |
|
|
Average rating: 8.00 |
Flavor: 7 out of 10 |
|
|
Value: 7 out of 10 |
|
|
Experience: 8 out of 10 |
|
|
Review notes: These cigars look great and smoke nicely; however, they need some time for the flavors to infuse. I think they have much potential, but I can't give them a 10 yet. |
|
|
|
|
| First Impressions |
Date Added: Monday 10 December, 2007 |
|
|
Review by Joseph |
Appearance: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Box Code/Year: RTO May 06 |
Construction: 7 out of 10 |
|
|
Average rating: 8.20 |
Flavor: 9 out of 10 |
|
|
Value: 7 out of 10 |
|
|
Experience: 8 out of 10 |
|
|
Review notes: I've been searching for others who have acquired this box code and can't find any info. The box packing and presentation are second to none. Very nice. The cap on one of the Edmundos had a few green, grassy blemishes. Under a magnifying glass, it definitely wasn't mold, but was embedded in the leaf. My first smoke was very tightly rolled, hard to draw. I re-clipped the end and began losing the wrapper. Kind of a disappointment. I will let them soften a little in my humidor before trying the second one. The taste was had a great, medium body and will improve with time, I imagine. Any info on box code RTO May 06 would be appreciated. |
|
|
|
|
| Edmundo |
Date Added: Monday 12 November, 2007 |
|
|
Review by Iacovos |
Appearance: 8 out of 10 |
|
|
|
Construction: 8 out of 10 |
|
|
Average rating: 8.00 |
Flavor: 8 out of 10 |
|
|
Value: 8 out of 10 |
|
|
Experience: 8 out of 10 |
|
|
Review notes: This cigar has exceptional appearance, with great construction, smooth woody taste throughout the cigar. |
|
|
|
|
| Very Smooth |
Date Added: Monday 29 October, 2007 |
|
|
Review by Leroy |
Appearance: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
|
Construction: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Average rating: 10.00 |
Flavor: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Value: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Experience: 10 out of 10 |
|
|
Review notes: Very smooth cigar and does not finish harsh or hard. The draw and burn are good as well. Not as strong as a #2. I now have another favorite cigar. |
|
|
|
|
| Displaying 1 to 29 (of 29 reviews) |
Result Pages: 1 |
|
|
|
 |
|
